This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I see the following: There is sinus tachycardia ( upright P wave with fixed PR interval in lead II ) — at the rapid rate of ~130/minute. Sinus Tachycardia and RAD — as already noted above. PEARL # 2: In the absence of associated heart failure ( cardiogenic shock ) — sinus tachycardia is not a common finding in acute MI.
Although sinus tachycardia is the most commonly encountered rhythmic disturbance, subsequent reports have highlighted other findings. Catheter-directed thrombolysis and a temporary pacemaker insertion were carried out sequentially. She presented with presyncope and an initial blood pressure of 77/63 mmHg.
This has been termed a “STEMI equivalent” and included in STEMI guidelines, suggesting this patient should receive dual anti-platelets, heparin and immediate cath lab activation–or thrombolysis in centres where cath lab is not available. A slightly prolonged QTc ( although this is difficult to assess given the tachycardia ).
NOTE: As discussed in detail in ECG Blog #108 — " A IVR" is an "enhanced" ventricular ectopic rhythm that occurs faster than the intrinsic ventricular escape rate ( which is typically between 20-40/minute ) — but slower than hemodynamically significant Ventricular Tachycardia ( ie, VT at rates >130-140/minute ).
While its action improves AV conduction it may increase the sinus rate, producing a sinus tachycardia with adverse effect. Comparable benefit from acute reperfusion ( by PCI or thrombolysis ) is seen in patients with acute coronary occlusion from an OMI, as from a STEMI. However, Atropine is not benign.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content