This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
TAVR and SAVR are procedures to replace a damaged aortic valve that is not functioning properly. TAVR and SAVR are procedures to replace a damaged aortic valve that is not functioning properly. The DEDICATE-DZHK6 trial compared TAVR vs. SAVR in 1,414 patients who underwent valve replacement procedures at 38 centers in Germany.
milla1cf Fri, 06/07/2024 - 14:50 June 7, 2024 — Medtronic today announced new data from the CoreValve Evolut Clinical Program , reinforcing the positive performance of the Evolut transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) System compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and other TAVR valves. Evolut vs. 10.6%
Getty Images milla1cf Mon, 01/29/2024 - 14:24 January 29, 2024 — Despite national guidelines recommending surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients under age 65 with severe aortic stenosis , many hospitals are still opting for a nonsurgical approach in patients under 60—possibly with poorer survival rates. for SAVR vs. 0.4%
Among patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, early TAVR was superior to clinical surveillance in reducing the incidence of death, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.
Patients with severe aortic stenosis who were treated with either TAVR or surgery had comparable rates of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at five years, according to research presented during a Late-Breaking Clinical Trial session at ACC.25 25 in Chicago and simultaneously published in JACC.
Getty Images milla1cf Wed, 05/15/2024 - 19:10 May 15, 2024 — A new study demonstrated parity between a minimally invasive procedure to replace the aortic valve in the heart— transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)—and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). 1.11, p=0.70) with similar long-term mortality risks.
The EARLY TAVR trial results demonstrate that early transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis is superior to clinical surveillance in significantly reducing the composite primary outcome of death, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.
In light of the growing number of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there is an increasing demand for data regarding the management of failed TAVR procedures, including the possibility of a repeat TAVR intervention. vs. 19.0%, p=0.57), as well as stroke at 30 days (2.0% vs. 3.3%, p=0.18).
A cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrates the positive economic value of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using Evolut TAVR compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for low-risk patients. The findings showed a strong economic benefit of Evolut TAVR for low-risk patients from a U.S.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), heart disease and stroke rank as the first and fifth leading causes of death in the nation. About 276,000 patients have undergone a TAVR procedure in the United States.
In women with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS), TAVR with the balloon-expandable valve was superior to surgical aortic valve replacement in terms of the composite rate of death, stroke and rehospitalization at one-year follow-up, according to a pooled analysis of patient-level data from RHEIA and PARTNER 3 trials presented at TCT 2024.
BACKGROUND:Current guidelines recommend surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis and unfavorable iliofemoral access. Transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TC-TAVR) has emerged as an alternative access in suboptimal transfemoral candidates, but no data exist comparing TC-TAVR and SAVR.
The goal of the PROTECTED TAVR trial was to evaluate the efficacy of intraprocedural cerebral embolic protection (CEP) in reducing strokes among patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR for aortic stenosis.
Objective To evaluate whether transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) affects clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in symptomatic patients with moderately-severe aortic stenosis (AS). Valve haemodynamics improved following TAVR (AVA 2.5±0.7 <aortic valve area (AVA)<1.5 cm 2 , 3.0<peak
Objective To investigate the impact of prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and coronary lesion complexity on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes for aortic stenosis. The CABG SYNTAX score did not influence the prognosis after TAVR. The median CABG SYNTAX score was 16 (interquartile range: 9.0–23),
Background:The optimal treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and small aortic annulus (SAA) remains to be determined. Participants were 151 patients with severe AS and SAA (mean diameter <23 mm) were randomized (1:1) to TAVR (n=77) vs SAVR (n=74), The primary outcome was impaired valve hemodynamics (i.e.
Seven studies showed that TAVR patients had a similar 1-year stroke risk to SAVR patients (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.64 In the TIA case, there was no evidence of a significant difference between TAVR and SAVR in the risk of having a transient ischemic attack within 30 days following surgery (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.17, p=0.30, I2 3%).
TAVR in heart failure. ABSTRACT Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may develop heart failure (HF), the presence of which has traditionally been deemed as a final stage in AS progression with poor outcomes. The prognostic covariates and optimal timing of TAVR in patients with less than severe AS remain unclear.
Abstract: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an interventional procedure performed in patients with severe aortic stenosis and often required perioperative antiplatelet therapy. Most previous studies have focused on antiplatelet therapy following TAVR.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is associated with increased risk of bleeding and stroke. Patients were randomized 1:1 to TAVR+LAAO or TAVR+medical therapy. For the composite primary endpoint, TAVR+.LAAO compared to 50.8%
Patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are predisposed to the development of aortic stenosis. We performed a pairwise meta-analysis, comparing the efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with BAV. to 4.58, p=0.04).
The study matched the criterion used in the current low-risk trials evaluating SAVR with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The most recent mid-term results from the PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low-Risk trials comparing risk of death and stroke from SAVR and TAVR are expected to be released in fall 2023.
SMART 4 ( NCT04722250 ) studied patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A total of 716 patients underwent TAVR with either a self-expanding supraannular valve or a balloon-expandable valve. vs. 6.2%) and stroke (2.9%
24 will focus on the following three current guideline updates: American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines 2023 Atrial Fibrillation Guideline - Pharmacology II: Strokes vs. Bleeds, What Do the Guidelines Tell Us About Practical Management in A-fib? The Guidelines Sessions at ACC.24
Stroke, Volume 56, Issue Suppl_1 , Page ATP316-ATP316, February 1, 2025. Background:Despite improvements in the safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), ~4% of patients experience a procedure-related stroke. We assessed if there was a difference in stroke events between cancer and non-cancer patients.
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair is Cost-Effective in Heart Failure Patients TAVR Expected to See Rapid Growth in Next 5 years FDA Clears Abbott Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder to Reduce Stroke in People With Atrial Fibrillation Portico TAVR System Found Safe and Effective for High-Risk Surgical Patients Portico TAVR System Reduces Severe (..)
Objective To compare long-term cardiovascular (CV) outcomes between men and women with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) by the type of valve implant. In the TAVR cohort, men suffered a higher risk of death (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.07 In the bioSAVR cohort, a higher risk of death (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04
Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Lead Author Title Publication Date Jacob Raphael Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Pulmonary Complications: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Analysis The Annals of Thoracic Surgery January 2024 Joseph Sabik Multi-Arterial versus Single-Arterial Coronary Surgery: Ten Year Follow-up of One Million (..)
Mark Erfe 2 Outcomes of Sutureless/Rapid Deployment Valves Compared to Traditional Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves The Annals of Thoracic Surgery September 2020 Victor Nauffal 2 Short-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Mediastinal Radiation-Associated Severe Aortic Stenosis Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions (..)
Findings from the TAVR UNLOAD trial found preemptive TAVR was not superior to clinical aortic stenosis surveillance (CASS) for the hierarchical occurrence of all-cause death, disabling stroke, disease-related hospitalizations and heart failure equivalents, and change in quality of life among patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and heart failure (..)
This year’s TCT conference saw a deluge of TAVR studies examining everything from the efficacy of valve designs to TAVR’s impact on aortic and tricuspid regurgitation. Patients who received early TAVR were 16% less likely to experience MACE and saw better heart function over a median of 3.8
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content