Remove Ischemia Remove Myocardial Infarction Remove STEMI
article thumbnail

Instructor Collection ECG: Anterior M.I. and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

ECG Guru

This is acute transmural ischemia, or ST elevation M.I. The more modern term for these ECG changes is “OMI”, or occlusion myocardial infarction. link] This term replaces "STEMI", as it includes myocarial injury with ST elevation and also with other ECG findings that are classified as "STEMI Equivalents".

article thumbnail

Dynamic OMI ECG. Negative trops and negative angiogram does not rule out coronary ischemia or ACS.

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Here is his ED ECG at triage: Obvious high lateral OMI that does not quite meet STEMI criteria. This confirms that the pain was ischemia and is now resovled. Furthermore, in studies reporting progression of insignificant lesions to total thrombotic occlusions, the mean interval between angiography and acute myocardial infarction is 2.5

Ischemia 115
article thumbnail

How cardiogenic shock in NSTEMI is different from STEMI?

Dr. S. Venkatesan MD

Cardiogenic shock (CS)is the most feared event following STEMI. We tend to perceive CS as an exclusive complication of STEMI. The incidence is half of that of STEMI, i.e., 2.5-5%. might show little elevation with considerable overlap of left main STEMI vs NSTEMI ) 2.Onset ACS pathophysiology is not that simple.

article thumbnail

Chest pain: Are these really "Nonspecific ST-T wave abnormalities", as the cardiologist interpretation states?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

The ECG did not meet STEMI criteria, and the final cardiology interpretation was “ST and T wave abnormality, consider anterior ischemia”. There’s only minimal ST elevation in III, which does not meet STEMI criteria of 1mm in two contiguous leads. But STEMI criteria is only 43% sensitive for OMI.[1]

article thumbnail

Ischemic ST depression maximal in V1-V4 (vs. V5-V6), even if less than 0.1 millivolt, is specific for Occlusion Myocardial Infarction (vs. subendocardial non-occlusive ischemia)

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

If this STD were due to LVH or to subendocardial ischemia, rather than posterior OMI, it would be maximal in V5 and V6. If I saw this without the STD V2-V4, I would not make anything of it, and even with that precordial STD, I am not convinced that it is a manifestation of ischemia. This is a HUGE myocardial infarction.

article thumbnail

Another myocardial wall is sacrificed at the altar of the STEMI/NonSTEMI mass delusion (and Opiate pain relief).

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Cath lab declined as it is not a STEMI." There is probably a trickle of flow which is why there is both subendocardial ischemia (ST depression) and early subepicardial ischemia (hyperacute T-waves). And now this finding is even formally endorsed as a "STEMI equivalent" in the 2022 ACC guidelines!!! It is a mass delusion.

STEMI 81
article thumbnail

What happened after the Cath lab was activated for a chest pain patient with this ECG?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

The interventional cardiologist then canceled the activation and returned the patient to the ED without doing an angiogram ("Not a STEMI"). I advised that perhaps posterior leads would help to persuade the interventionalist, since the 2022 ACC recommendations include posterior STEMI as a formal STEMI equivalent, but only officially by 0.5