This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Introduction:Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive outpatient therapy designed to improve arterial health, cardiac efficiency, and coronary collateral formation by applying sequential external pressure aligned with the patient’s cardiac cycle.
Journal of the American Heart Association, Ahead of Print. BackgroundAnnual hearttransplant (HT) volumes have increased, as have post‐HT outpatient care needs. Older patients and those with cardiac primary diagnoses had the highest risk of death.
The primary endpoint is a hierarchical composite assessment consisting of all-cause death, the cardiac death equivalents of hearttransplant and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, heart failure hospitalizations, worsening heart failure events treated as an outpatient, and change in quality-of-life, with a follow-up duration ranging (..)
The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of death, hearttransplant/left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, HF hospitalization, outpatient HF worsening, and quality of life.
The results showed no significant difference between groups in terms of the trial’s primary endpoint, a hierarchical composite ranking of death from any cause; hearttransplant or left ventricular assist device; heart failure hospitalizations; worsening of outpatientheart failure events; and change in quality of life, as measured using the Kansas (..)
The results showed no significant difference between groups in terms of the trial’s primary endpoint, a hierarchical composite ranking of death from any cause; hearttransplant or left ventricular assist device; heart failure hospitalizations; worsening of outpatientheart failure events; and change in quality of life, as measured using the Kansas (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content