This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Not only does this result in a cumbersome and inefficient workflow, as cardiologists must bounce between systems and locations to retrieve and compare relevant prior and current multi-modality information, it can also result in critical information gaps that have a direct, negative impact on patientcare and outcomes.
This particular onslaught of ECG madness is prime setting for frustration as you attempt to navigate complex diagnostics while simultaneously holding on to the big picture of patientcare trajectory. Indeed, bedside Echocardiogram revealed severe left ventricular impairment of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.
But as the new variants and their implications started showcasing in the infected patients, it became clear that it has several physiological manifestations. Among numerous other disorders, patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases have the largest mortality rate.
Cardiac enzymes, CTs, echocardiograms, carotid ultrasounds, and electroencephalography all affected diagnosis or management in Postural blood pressure , performed in only 38% of episodes, had the highest yield with respect to affecting diagnosis (18-26%) or management (25-30%) and determining etiology of the syncopal episode (15-21%).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content