This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) remains one of the most effective therapies for preventing suddencardiacdeath (SCD). Data supporting the role of primary prevention ICDs in patients with heart failure were generated by rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs).1
Image courtesy of Yoshihiro Sobue from Fujita Health University mtaschetta-millane Tue, 07/30/2024 - 09:18 July 30, 2024 — Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) having a compromised blood supply, are at greater risk of suddencardiacdeath (SCD).
This randomized clinical trial assesses whether cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is more effective than amiodarone therapy for the primary prevention of all-cause mortality and secondary prevention of suddencardiacdeath, hospitalization for heart failure, and use of a pacemaker among patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy.
Image courtesy of UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science / James Tye milla1cf Tue, 12/19/2023 - 18:19 December 19, 2023 — A vest that can map the electrical activity of the heart in fine detail could potentially be used to better identify people at high risk of suddencardiacdeath , suggests a new study led by UCL researchers.
Suddencardiacdeath (SCD) remains a pressing health issue, affecting hundreds of thousands each year globally. Conventional risk stratification, which primarily relies on left ventricular ejection fraction, has resulted in only modest efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for SCD prevention.
Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the reference standard for preventing suddencardiacdeath (SCD) but have risks associated with intravascular lead placement.
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with an increased risk of ventricular fibrillation (VF), leading to suddencardiacdeath. 1 However, variations in the efficacy of these drugs remain unclear, particularly regarding low-dose quinidine.
Introduction Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCD) have emerged as a valuable tool in the management of patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias. These devices offer a non-invasive and temporary solution, providing continuous monitoring and the potential for prompt defibrillation when needed.
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a genetic heart disease that predisposes individuals to ventricular arrhythmias and suddencardiacdeath. Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and quinidine are primary treatments, recurrent BrS-triggered ventricular arrhythmias can persist.
2, 2024 – Medtronic recently shared long-term results from the global Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (EV ICD) Pivotal Trial, reinforcing the performance and safety of the EV-ICD system. chief medical officer of the Cardiac Rhythm Management business, which is part of the Cardiovascular Portfolio at Medtronic.
Unlike a heart attack, cardiac arrest is an electrical malfunction that causes the heart to stop beating suddenly. Without immediate intervention, suddencardiacdeath can occur within minutes. Use an automated external defibrillator (AED) if available. Call for emergency medical assistance immediately.
Suddencardiacdeath is an important cause of mortality in patients with kidney failure undergoing renal replacement therapy, either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The risk factors associated with suddencardiacdeath in these patients only partly overlap with those in the general population.
ABSTRACT The first viable alternative to surgical implantation of an epicardial defibrillator system for secondary prevention of suddencardiacdeath (SCD) was a single chamber transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
C ASE C onclusion: As noted above — today's patient developed cardiac arrest shortly after arrival in the ED. Despite prolonged resuscitation with multiple defibrillation attempts — the patient could not be saved. = Bidirectional VT: Challenges and Solutions ( Almarzuqi et al — Vasc Health Risk Mgmt 18:3997-406, 2022 ).
The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is becoming a more and more widely used instrument for the prevention of suddencardiacdeath of patients either with a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator indication or with a transient high risk of suddencardiacdeath.
The main function of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is to protect against suddencardiacdeath (SCD) due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA).
Possible arrhythmic recurrences and the risk of suddencardiacdeath (SCD) in this setting are reasons for concern, and limited data have been published to guide clinical management of these patients.
Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) having a compromised blood supply, are at greater risk of suddencardiacdeath (SCD). With an estimated incidence as high as 22% among these patients, current clinical guidelines recommend using implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) to help mitigate the risk of SCD.
BACKGROUND:Declining cardiovascular mortality rates have been well-documented, yet temporal trends of suddencardiacdeath (SCD) in young individuals remain unclear. to 28%, mainly because of increased bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation rates. Circulation, Ahead of Print.
Implantable cardiacdefibrillators (ICDs) are a fundamental therapy used in the prevention of suddencardiacdeath (SCD). Contemporary trials have been incorporated into national guidelines to support their use. However, the elderly are usually excluded or not well represented.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with risk of suddencardiacdeath (SCD). Since approval in late 2012, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (SICD) has been used as an alternative to the traditional transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) for SCD prevention in HCM.
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) has emerged as an alternative to transvenous ICD for the prevention of suddencardiacdeath in patients without pacing indications.
The use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention (PP) of suddencardiacdeath among select patients with heart failure (HF) is recommended by the HRS, AHA and ACC. However, whether ICDs may be underutilized within a safety-net system has not been studied.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are used for primary and secondary prevention of suddencardiacdeath. In this case, we highlight a unique complication of increased defibrillator shock impedance in a patient with breast implants followed by normalization after breast implant removal.
Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is an alternative option for the prevention of suddencardiacdeath in patients at high risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has emerged as an alternative to transvenous systems for preventing suddencardiacdeath. However, concerns have been raised regarding its efficacy and safety in obese individuals.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with risk of suddencardiacdeath (SCD). Since approval in late 2012, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (SICD) has been used as an alternative to the traditional transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) for SCD prevention in HCM.
Despite an elevated risk of suddencardiacdeath among dialysis patients, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have not been shown to improve mortality and are associated with high complication rates.
ABSTRACT Introduction Substernal extravascular defibrillators (EV ICDs) have been shown to be effective and safe for patients at risk of suddencardiacdeath, however, there is little evidence around the safety of extracting chronic devices.
Does use of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and/or other variables identify patients who benefit from defibrillator implantation to prevent suddendeath after acute myocardial infarction (MI)?
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) alleviate many issues associated with a transvenous system, while having similar efficacy to transvenous ICDs at preventing suddencardiacdeath. However, S-ICDs have higher rates of shocks due to a lack of anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP).
Background Consensus guidelines support the use of implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention of suddencardiacdeath in patients with either non-ischaemic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%.
Despite the abundance of evidence supporting the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of suddencardiacdeath (SCD), racial and gender inequities in ICD implantation persist.1,2
ß-blockers and flecainide have been used for treatment of VT as were implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) for prevention of suddencardiacdeath (SCD).
Here is the transcript of the video: Implantable defibrillator is an important life saving device. Then, why is it mentioned that, implanting a defibrillator soon after an acute myocardial infarction, in those with left ventricular dysfunction and prone for ventricular arrhythmias and suddencardiacdeath, is not useful?
For the past four decades, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy has become the standard of care for preventing suddencardiacdeath in high-risk individuals. The rate of ICD implantation has risen due to the increasing population age and the growing prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias.
Suddencardiacdeath is one of the main causes of mortality in patients with known or occult cardiac disease and is potentially preventable by early resuscitation.
Over the course of several decades, the transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) has grown to become a safe and effective treatment for the prevention of suddencardiacdeath. During this time, there have been numerous iterative refinements to the system and implant technique.
However, limited data exist on the global trends of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) utilization and its impact on mortality/morbidity burden reduction.METHODS:Electronic databases were systematically searched up to March 2024 for studies reporting on ICD utilization rates in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mean age was 46.2
5,6 “We are very proud that our DX technology provides the only lead available on the market offering both ventricular pacing/defibrillation and atrial monitoring,” said Ryan Walters, BIOTRONIK US President. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Volume 30, Issue 10, October 2019, Pages 1994–2001. 2023;12:e029126. O'Connor M, et al.
Background:Epicardial patch defibrillators (EPDs) were commonly implanted in the 1990s for secondary prevention of suddencardiacdeath. This case highlights such a scenario.Case:A 75-year-old female with a history of cardiac arrest 30 years ago presented with shortness of breath and left leg swelling.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) prevents suddencardiacdeath (SCD) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Catheter ablation has been shown to effectively reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence, yet its efficacy in patients without an ICD implantation remains uncertain.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content