This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This ECG was read as “No STEMI” with no prior available for comparison. It is true this ECG does not meet STEMI criteria (there is 1.0 The Queen of Hearts sees it of course: Still none of these three ECGs meet STEMI criteria. Two stents were placed with resultant TIMI 3 flow. What do you think? Of course not.
He reports that this chest pain feels different than prior chest pain when he had his STEMI/OMI, but is unable to further describe chest pain. VF was refractory to amiodarone, lidocaine, double-sequential defibrillation, esmolol, etc. Sensitivity was 87% for OMI in our validation study (it was 34% for STEMI criteria).
Here is his ED ECG: There is obvious infero-posterior STEMI. What are you worried about in addition to his STEMI? At cath, he immediately had incessant Torsades de Pointes requiring defibrillation 7 times and requiring placement of a transvenous pacer for overdrive pacing at a rate of 80. This was stented.
RBBB in acute STEMI has a very high mortality. A stent was placed, and the patient had an excellent outcome with no wall motion abnormality. But here there is a large degree of ST elevation in V2-V6, I, and aVL. The paramedics activated the cath lab from the field.
She was found to be in ventricular fibrillation and was defibrillated 8 times without a single, even transient, conversion out of fibrillation. She was immediately intubated during continued compressions, then underwent a 9th defibrillation, which resulted in an organized rhythm at 42 minutes after initial arrest. It was stented.
There is a very small amount of STE in some of the anterior, lateral, and inferior leads which do NOT meet STEMI criteria. The case was reviewed by all parties, and it was stated correctly that the ECG does not meet the STEMI criteria. He was defibrillated immediately and had return of normal mental status.
So there is definitely no STEMI, and the STE is normal. But after reading this blog, you all know that most OMI do NOT meet STEMI criteria. Bedside echo revealed anteroseptal wall motion abnormality at which point I activated a code STEMI. 100% proximal LAD successfully stented. Defibrillated out of v fib in the cath lab.
He denied any known medical history, specifically: coronary artery disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, heart failure, myocardial infarction, or any prior PCI/stent. It doesn’t meet any conventional STEMI criteria, but there is patently obvious increased area under the curve. No appreciable skin pallor. Is this OMI?
After the second defibrillation the patient had an organized rhythm: Bradycardic escape/agonal rhythm, with large ST deviations. A repeat ECG was done: Obvious anterolateral wall STEMI. The patient was taken back to the cath lab, where 100% proximal in-stent rethrombosis was found and treated. This is diagnostic of re-occlusion.
After stent deployment, we often see improvement in the ST-T within seconds or minutes. Here is the final angiogram following placement of a stent in the ostial RCA. 2:04 PM, post stent deployment You can see that even after complete restoration of flow, the ECG still looks terrible, V most of all. SanzRuiz, R., Solis, J., &
Unfortunately, the ECG was interpreted as no significant change from prior , "no STEMI"!! Defibrillation was performed, and ROSC was achieved. Approximately 5 minutes after ROSC, this ECG was obtained (about 45 minutes after arrival): Obvious anterolateral OMI, and STEMI criteria positive for those who care or need it.
The report describes heavy plaque in the proximal RCA by IVUS, but no lesions in the previously occluded RPL branch and no stent was deployed. Throughout this process, the patient had repeated VF and was defibrillated 8 times. It is consistent with an inferior LV aneurysm. It is almost certainly not acute.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content