This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Circulation: CardiovascularImaging, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Recently, it was reported that noncalcified plaque (NCP) volume was an independent predictor for cardiac events. P<0.001) than the group with low NCP plaque volume. P<0.001) than the group with low NCP plaque volume. versus 75.9%;P<0.001),
The reason: They were accumulating plaque in their coronary arteries much earlier than their peers. You can’t have a heart attack if you don’t have plaque in your coronary arteries. And plaque in your coronary arteries is the result of exposure to risk factors over time. The answer: Risk Factors. The answer.
Circulation: CardiovascularImaging, Ahead of Print. A decrease in the percentage of unstable core (fibro-fatty+necrotic plaque; from 14.1 [7.9–22.3] BACKGROUND:Intensive lipid-lowering therapy may induce coronary atherosclerosis regression. The global coronary PB changed from 34.6% (32.5%–36.8%) 10.6]; −6.6%;P<0.001)
Circulation: CardiovascularImaging, Volume 17, Issue 2 , Page e016178, February 1, 2024. BACKGROUND:It is not known whether there is a sex difference in the association between perivascular inflammation and plaque vulnerability. All images were analyzed at a core laboratory. plaques per patient).
Circulation: CardiovascularImaging, Volume 17, Issue 2 , Page e016057, February 1, 2024. P=0.004), while men had a higher frequency of high-risk plaques (53.7% Those with enhanced imaging biomarkers of stress-related neural activity showed increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular event both in women (24.5%
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content