This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Authors' commentary: Cardiogenicshock in the setting of severe aortic stenosis. This patient’s severe aortic stenosis (AS) and associated severe cardiogenicshock likely created the ECG pattern, resulting in a very difficult challenge for our inpatient team. If you can use Doppler, then you can diagnose it.
The axiom of "type 1 (ACS, plaque rupture) STEMIs are not tachycardic unless they are in cardiogenicshock" is not applicable outside of sinus rhythm. 2) Tachycardia to this degree can cause ST segment changes in several ways. Sometimes you must correct the rhythm to see what lies underneath. Is this inferor STEMI?
The findings include sinus tachycardia, characteristic QRS morphology most diagnostic in V3 with a small R wave followed by a very large S wave with a convex upward ST segment morphology, ST segment strain morphology in the inferior and anterior leads leading to deep symmetric T-wave inversion. and tachycardia, 1.8. incomplete RBBB 1.7
Tachycardia (or nearly) 2. Tachycardia, = 1.8. Finally , they found these independent predictors of PE: Note that tachycardia only has an Odds ratio of 1.8. Tachycardia is unusual in ACS unless there is cardiogenicshock or a second simultaneous pathology. Poor R-wave progression 4. Domed T-wave inversion 5.
Why is the patient in shock? He was in profound cardiogenicshock. Both of these features make inferior + RV MI by far the most likely ( Pseudoanteroseptal MI is another name for this ) There is also sinus bradycardia and t he patient is in shock with hypotension. There is an obvious inferior STEMI, but what else?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content