This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
BackgroundDespite robust evidence supporting an association with improved outcomes in eligible patients, cardiacrehabilitation (CR) remains underused, with a minority of eligible patients participating. Journal of the American Heart Association, Volume 13, Issue 24 , December 17, 2024.
When compared to virtual cardiacrehabilitation, center-based cardiacrehabilitation was associated with a 38.4% higher hospital readmission rate, according to a study published Dec. 14 in the Journal of the American Heart Association.
Individuals with HF and AF may have a reduced functional capacity and quality of life (QoL) which leads to hospital admission and burden on clinical services. However, there is no existing data on the effectiveness of comprehensive cardiacrehabilitation (CR) in individuals with coexisting HF and AF. ±9.8%
Background The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the uptake of digital health interventions for the delivery of cardiacrehabilitation (CR). Methods We examined the impact of an evidence-based, digital CR programme on medical, lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes. However, there is a need to evaluate these interventions.
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Ahead of Print. Background:Traditional cardiacrehabilitation (CR) improves cardiovascular outcomes and reduces mortality, but less is known about the relative benefit of intensive CR (ICR) which incorporates greater lifestyle education through 72 sessions (versus 36 in CR).
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Volume 16, Issue 11 , Page e010148, November 1, 2023. BACKGROUND:Although disparities in cardiacrehabilitation (CR) participation are well documented, the role of community-level distress is poorly understood. to −6.7%]), all-cause hospitalization (−5.9% [95% CI, −6.3%
This 2023 Cochrane review of 60 randomized trials in 8728 heart failure patients, confirms the benefits of participation in exercise-based cardiacrehabilitation (ExCR), including reduced risk of hospitalization and a clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life. 1.01, MLWHF: −9.59, 95% CI −17.48
BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) can improve cardiovascular health. fewer subsequent annual inpatient hospitalizations per 1000 beneficiaries (95% CI, 58.8 A higher amount of participation was associated with a further reduction in hospitalizations and expenditures. had an acute myocardial infarction, 17.5%
The targeted content, delivery, and outcomes of interventions that benefit this population remain unclear. years) were purposively selected from 5 large tertiary care hospitals. years) were purposively selected from 5 large tertiary care hospitals. women; mean age, 53.2 years) women; mean age, 53.2 years)
The primary outcome is the mean difference between the intervention versus control groups in distance walked on the 6‐minute walk test (ie, functional capacity) at 12 weeks post randomization.
However, the role of body composition, including body fat percentage and lean body mass (LBM), in cardiovascular outcomes has not been well studied in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Future research studying the implications of changes in body composition on outcomes in men and women with CAD is warranted.
IntroductionComprehensive, hybrid cardiacrehabilitation (CR) models have been scantly investigated in heart failure (HF) populations, particularly in low-resource settings. 152 HF patients (NYHA class II or III) will be recruited consecutively, and randomly assigned using permuted blocks; allocation will be concealed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content