This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cardiacarrest can cause diffuse subendocardial ischemia, usually transient (it often resolves as time goes by after ROSC). It was stented. Also, anterior MI could result from 1) ACS, but also from 2) severe ischemia due to combination of a hemodynamically significant LAD stenosis + severe hypotension during cardiacarrest.
Given the presentation, the cardiologist stented the vessel and the patient returned to the ICU for ongoing critical care. Echocardiogram showed LVEF 66% with normal wall motion and normal diastolic function. Lesions less than 70% are generally considered to be non-flow limiting. Two subsequent troponins were down trending.
I think a good start would be a posterior EKG and a high quality contrast echocardiogram read by an expert. It was thought to be an in stent restenosis and thrombosis from a DES placed in the same region 6 months prior. His prior EF from an ECHO 6 months prior indicated 35% LVEF. What would you do in this scenario?
Smith comment: The patient was lucky to have a cardiacarrest. By undergoing an arrest, providers became aware of his OMI which had not been noticed on his diagnostic ECG, and he thus has a chance at some myocardial salvage. Total proximal LAD occlusion was found and stented at angiography soon after the ECG above.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content