This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There’s competing sinus bradycardia and junctional rhythm, with otherwise normal conduction, borderline right axis, normal R wave progression and voltages. While STEMI negative, the ECG is diagnostic of proximal LAD occlusion. Transient STEMI” are often managed like non-STEMI with delayed angiography, which is very risky.
There is an obvious inferior STEMI, but what else? Besides the obvious inferior STEMI, there is across the precordial leads also, especially in V1. This STE is diagnostic of Right Ventricular STEMI (RV MI). In fact, the STE is widespread, mimicking an anterior STEMI. EKG is pictured below: What do you think?
This ECG was read as “No STEMI” with no prior available for comparison. It is true this ECG does not meet STEMI criteria (there is 1.0 Soon afterward, the patient’s symptoms return along with lightheadedness, bradycardia, and hypotension. The Queen of Hearts sees it of course: Still none of these three ECGs meet STEMI criteria.
His first electrocardiogram ( ECG) is given below: --Sinus bradycardia. The lesion was successfully stented. Take home messages: 1- In STEMI/NSTEMI paradigm you search for STE on ECG. Blood pressure: 130/80 mmHg, heart rate: 45/min, respiratory rate: 18/min, SaO2: %98, body temperature: normal. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars.
I will leave more detailed rhythm discussion to the illustrious Dr. Ken Grauer below, but this use of calipers shows that the rhythm interpretation is: Sinus bradycardia with a competing (most likely junctional) rhythm. For national registry purposes, this will be incorrectly classified as a STEMI.) Large STEMI are approximately 30-80.
Here is his ED ECG: There is obvious infero-posterior STEMI. What are you worried about in addition to his STEMI? There is also bradycardia. Bradycardia puts patients at risk for "pause-dependent" Torsades de Pointes. Bradycardia puts patients at risk for "pause-dependent" Torsades de Pointes. This was stented.
I see the following: The rhythm is sinus bradycardia at ~55-60/minute. These tall T waves are associated with flattening ( straightening ) of the ST segment in the inferior leads — with slight S T elevation in leads V2-thru-V6 ( albeit not enough to qualify as a "STEMI" — Akbar et al, StatPearls, 2023 ).
A prehospital “STEMI” activation was called on a 75 year old male ( Patient 1 ) with a history of hyperlipidemia and LAD and Cx OMI with stent placement. The two cases were considered: Patient 1 was recognized by the ED provider and the cardiologist as having resolved “STEMI”. It was stented.
He reports that this chest pain feels different than prior chest pain when he had his STEMI/OMI, but is unable to further describe chest pain. Sensitivity was 87% for OMI in our validation study (it was 34% for STEMI criteria). He has a h/o of 3 vessel disease and stents and his pain has been on and off for days.
The ECG shows sinus bradycardia but is otherwise normal. On the combined basis of angiography and IVUS, this patient received stents to his mid RCA, proximal PDA, and OM. RCA and PDA before and after, arrows indicating stented regions. OM before and after, arrow indicating stented region. The following ECG was obtained.
Here is his ED ECG: There is bradycardia with a junctional escape. There is an obvious inferior posterior STEMI(+) OMI. Case continued A bedside ultrasound showed diminished LV EF and of course bradycardia. Angiogram: Culprit Lesion (s): Thrombotic occlusion of the proximal RCA -- stented. What is the atrial activity?
Sinus bradycardia, normal conduction, normal axis, normal R wave progression, no hypertrophy. Step 1 to missing posterior MI is relying on the STEMI criteria. A prospective validation of STEMI criteria based on the first ED ECG found it was only 21% sensitive for Occlusion MI, and disproportionately missed inferoposterior OMI.[1]
He denied any known medical history, specifically: coronary artery disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, heart failure, myocardial infarction, or any prior PCI/stent. It doesn’t meet any conventional STEMI criteria, but there is patently obvious increased area under the curve. No appreciable skin pallor. Is this OMI?
These kinds of cases were excluded from the study as obvious anterior STEMI. --QTc Case 1 Acute anterior STEMI from LAD occlusion, or Benign Early Repolarization (BER)? Appropriately, the physicians repeated the ECG 20 minutes later and it was diagnostic of anterior STEMI. Why bradycardia? QTc is the computer measurement.
Here is his previous ECG: This was my interpretation of the first ECG: Sinus bradycardia with less than 1mm ST elevation in V4-V6, elevated compared to the previous ECG, suggestive of lateral MI. Both were stented. Moreover, T-wave inversion in aVL was also found to be 100% sensitive and 86% specific for inferior STEMI.
Here are inferior leads, and aVL, magnified: A closer inspection of the inferior leads and aVL Sinus bradycardia. The patient was then taken to the cath lab an found to have a proximal RCA 100% thrombotic occlusion which was successfully stented. 3) STEMI criteria failed to identify this acute coronary occlusion, like many others.
It does not meet STEMI criteria. Obvious STEMI(+) OMI of inferior, posterior, and lateral walls, now with likely 2nd degree heart block type 1 (Wenckebach). She was taken to cath and found to have total mid RCA occlusion, TIMI 0 flow, stented with excellent result. Anyway, she does say OMI. Easy for anyone. AI can do it too.
Note: according to the STEMI paradigm these ECGs are easy, but in reality they are difficult. Theres inferior STE which meets STEMI criteria, but this is in the context of tall R waves (18mm) and relatively small T waves, and the STD/TWI in aVL is concordant to the negative QRS. This was false positive STEMI with an ECG mimicking OMI.
Case submitted by Andrew Grimes, Advanced Care paramedic, with additions from Jesse McLaren and Smith An 84-year-old male with a notable cardiac history (CABG, multiple stents) woke at 0500hrs with pressure in his chest, diaphoresis, and light-headedness. STEMI criteria are only 43% sensitive for OMI.
Within ten minutes, she developed bradycardia, hypotension, and ST changes on monitor. Bradycardia and heart block are very common in RCA OMI. After stent deployment, we often see improvement in the ST-T within seconds or minutes. Here is the final angiogram following placement of a stent in the ostial RCA.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content