article thumbnail

The most popular Heart Sisters article in 2024

Heart Sisters

Was this particular article the most popular of 2024 because my HEART SISTERS readers aren't getting clear jargon-free, patient-friendly answers from their doctors?

Article 67
article thumbnail

Mapping the intersection of sudden cardiac death and COVID-19: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis (2020–2024)

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

2,915 articles were retrieved, with 70.5% Despite fewer publications, China's research had a notable impact, indicated by high average citations per article. Co-citation analysis revealed seminal works that shaped the discourse, with influential articles by Xu Z et al. and Guo T et al. frequently cited.

article thumbnail

Gene-related metabolic dysfunction may be driving heart arrhythmia

Science Daily - Heart Disease

Patients with a common heart arrhythmia called Atrial Fibrillation could benefit from future treatments that target inefficiencies in heart cell metabolism, according to a new article.

article thumbnail

Finally – the end (of the trial process)

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick

Which is five years and nine months after the articles in the Mail on Sunday were published. And you will note that Barney Calman, the gentleman – and I use this word loosely – who devised and wrote the articles has remained tight lipped. Firstly, the articles were clearly a hatchet job designed to destroy my reputation.

Article 111
article thumbnail

We have a judgment (Part 1)

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick

The Mail on Sunday published article(s) that we felt were very damaging and defamatory. There was much discussion, in the articles, of this being far worse that the MMR scandal involving Andrew Wakefield. You may remember that he was stuck off as a doctor for his papers and articles on the MMR vaccine. If what I did was worse.

Article 111
article thumbnail

A Win

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick

1 It is a much longer thing, which lays out in more detail, what was wrong with the article, and may contain sections such as: ‘Mr Calman allowed the experts who had helped him to have “a very significant”, and “undue”, influence over the editorial process and the terms of the article. ‘ Boy, do these things take ages.

Article 130
article thumbnail

A little more on the trial

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick

Save for necessarily identifying those passages of the Articles that I have found to be privileged (or are agreed by the parties to be privilege) for the purposes of Curistan, the resolution of these other issues has no bearing on the objective assessment of the natural and ordinary meaning of the Articles and fact/opinion.

Article 106