This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
New-onset arrhythmias are common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, scarce data exists regarding arrhythmia risk in overlap syndrome (OS), encompassing COPD and OSA.
Specific cardiovascular diseases, such as acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, pulmonary hypertension and pericarditis, were also pointed. Elevated risk of arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, correlated with occupational silica exposure.
Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent arrhythmia with a lifetime risk of nearly 30%. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most effective treatment for rhythm control. It can be associated with reduced quality of life and complications such as heart failure and stroke.
Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has become a safe and effective alternative to surgical PVR in tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), isolated pulmonary stenosis (PS), and other congenital heart disease (CHD) variants.
Current guideline indications for intervention in asymptomatic patient are centred on left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction and may include consideration in atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension and those with left atrial dilatation.
At present we do not have any reliable intra-procedural electrophysiologic predictors of long-term success of AF ablation other than pulmonary vein isolation. We evaluated selected intraprocedural pulmonary vein characteristics that may be helpful in future guidance of persistent AF ablation. Results PV capture was identified in 20.3%
For full discussion of the case — CLICK HERE — ECG Rhythm Overview: A 12-year-old boy was admitted to our hospital with severe myocardial dysfunction and chaotic rhythm with tachy- and bradycardic arrhythmias. Perhaps the patient has pulmonary hypertension and/or tricuspid regurgitation?
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Baseline heart rate (HR) in normal sinus rhythm (NSR) has been observed to increase after PVI, thought to be due to modification of ganglionated plexi during PVI.
The AP Fontan operation and the total cavo-pulmonary connection (TCPC) have revolutionised the surgical treatment of patients with functionally univentricular hearts. However, post-surgical arrhythmias contribute considerably to morbidity and mortality and can be difficult to manage.
The results of pulmonary vein isolation are limited by arrhythmia recurrence, which is most often due to a failure to effectuate a durable contiguous circumferential transmural lesion around the pulmonary vein (PV) ostia.
Low voltage area (LVA) and low conduction velocity (CV) are promising risk factors to identify patients with abnormal atrial substrate at a high risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
BackgroundAtrial dysfunction is a risk factor for atrial arrhythmia and can be detected by atrial strain imaging in patients with biventricular circulation. Newonset and recurrent atrial arrhythmias were ascertained from baseline encounter to last followup.
Whilst pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the key endpoint for catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), it is unknown whether adjunctive carinal ablation impacts outcome beyond achieving first pass isolation.
Figure 1 shows the chest radiograph of the first patient diagnosed with amiodarone pulmonary toxicity back in 1978.1 Amiodarone had been in use for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias for more than a decade by the time we first identified a potential association of amiodarone therapy and pulmonary toxicity.1
Atrial arrhythmias (AA) are common in patients with pulmonary disease and various cancers. However, the association between AA and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the impact of AA on overall clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC are not well-known.
Recurrent arrhythmia post PVI is most often secondary to pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections. The evidence on use of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) vs. isoproterenol (ISO) during PVI to reduce recurrence of arrhythmia is conflicting.
Patients with D-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) palliated with atrial switch often develop atrial arrhythmias (AA) requiring pulmonary venous atrium (PVA) access for ablation, which can be achieved via retrograde aortic approach (RAA) or trans-baffle access (TBA).13
Despite advances in treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), AF recurrence remains a challenge. High tx burden pre-PVI may lead to difficulty maintaining arrhythmia freedom post-PVI.
Although increasing evidence supports substrate-based ablation strategies targeting extra-PV sources, reliable endpoints during CA beyond pulmonary vein (PV) isolation are not well established. Recently, a novel dipole charge density mapping (DCDM) system was developed for CA of complex arrhythmias.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, leading to significant cardiovascular complications such as ischemic stroke, heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established treatment for rhythm control in patients with AF.
With the advent of self-expanding transcatheter valves that can be safely deployed into the native RVOT, it is now possible to avoid repeat cardiac operations to address progressive pulmonary valve dysfunction.
Background Pulmonary vein isolation with wide antral ablation leads to better clinical outcomes for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, but the isolation lesion is invisible in conventional cryoballoon ablation. The primary outcome was a clinical recurrence of documented atrial arrhythmias for >30 s during the 1-year follow-up.
Animal studies suggest that catheter ablation-associated parasympathetic and sympathetic denervation could result in increased ventricular arrhythmias (VA). The impact of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on VA burden in humans has not been assessed.
Objective We report the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of focal monopolar PFA in patients with the origin of their atrial arrhythmia in the SVC. Conclusions In this patient cohort with SVC-triggered atrial arrhythmia, isolation using focal monopolar PFA was feasible, effective, and safe.
Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) adjunctive techniques with PVI alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:High-power short-duration ablation has shown impressive efficacy and safety for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI); however, initial efficacy results with very high power short-duration ablation were discouraging. No complications occurred.
This forms the physiologic rationale for the accepted convention of a three-month blanking period, during which arrhythmia recurrences are presumed to be relatively benign and not indicative of treatment failure. However, this reasoning disregards valuable data regarding early arrhythmia recurrences and their potential significance.
Young adults had a higher proportion of FAT originating from the superior vena cava and pulmonary veins. After a mean follow-up of 47.2 months, FAT recurred in 57 patients.
A thirty-seven-year-old woman with a Taussig-Bing anomaly had a complex repair with placement of a conduit from the right ventricle (RV) to the pulmonary artery (PA) during childhood (Figure 1A-C show anatomy). MRI revealed delayed enhancement associated with the conduit anastomosis.
Although the QDOT MICRO™ Catheter was mainly designed for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) its versatility to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) and other types of arrhythmias was recently evaluated by the FAST and FURIOUS study series and other studies and will be presented in this article.
Both atria develop from a combination of the primitive atrium, sinus venous, and pulmonary veins.It Spatial relationship of sites for atrial fibrillation drivers and atrial tachycardia in patients with both arrhythmias July 2017 International Journal of Cardiology 248(3) AF begets AF. Let us see few factors. References Nil ,
PVI, pulmonary vein isolation. Herein we describe the effects of catheter ablation on AF burden, arrhythmia recurrences, and ventricular function in end-stage HF. Overall, 97 patients received ablation; 66 patients (68%) underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and 31 patients (32%) were treated with PVI and additional ablation.
Identifying nearfield and farfield signals is critical to mapping and ablating cardiac arrhythmias. This assessment is qualitative, depending on the sharpness of electrograms. Electrogram peak frequency (PF) is hypothesized to be a quantitative measure of signal proximity.
Catheter ablation via pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF). It is unclear whether additional lesions with PVI using the novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique affects outcomes in this population.
Unlike paroxysmal AF, which describes symptoms that last for seven days or fewer, persistent AF is a sustained arrhythmia that lasts for more than a week 1. Early treatment of persistent AF can reduce the risk of blood clots, stroke, and heart failure, and may prevent the disease from becoming permanent.
2 BB area pacing defined using P-wave criteria has been associated with decreased atrial arrhythmia burden, recurrence, and de novo incidence compared with right atrial septal pacing and right atrial appendage pacing.3
Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation targeting extra-pulmonary vein drivers using various technologies has delivered varying results from no benefit to significant arrhythmia free survival.
The approach for recurrent persistent AF, beyond pulmonary vein isolation, remains contentious. Despite advances, catheter ablation success rates for persistent AF remain at 50-60%. Surgical maze procedures have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to catheter ablation.
While pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) durability appears comparable between PFA and TA, the necessity of post-ablation remapping remains uncertain. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising new alternative to thermal ablation (TA) for atrial fibrillation (AF), improving safety and duration of procedure times.
Abstract Background The newly introduced nonthermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology to achieve fast pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with high acute success rates and good safety features. Two tamponades occurred in the PFA while in VHPSD two pts suffered groin bleedings.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been established as a cornerstone therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). 1 Several studies have highlighted the significant role of non-pulmonary premature atrial complexes (non-PV PACs) in triggering AF/AT episodes.2,3
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content