This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a recognised outcome in patients with myocardial infarction, although heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is more common. to 1.97), and a similar association was observed for aorticvalve peak velocity (HR: 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 m/s had a 2.10-fold
In an era of rapidly expanding use of transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI), the management of patients with bicuspid aorticvalve (BAV) disease is far less well established than in those with trileaflet anatomy.
Transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) has become a leading treatment for aortic stenosis, but managing thromboembolic and bleeding risks post-procedure remains challenging. This review examines current evidence on antithrombotic therapy after TAVR.
The sociodemographic characteristics of patients undergoing intervention for aortic stenosis (AS) in England, and the impact of COVID-19, is unknown. Background Health inequalities in cardiovascular care have been identified in the UK.
ObjectivesRegistered, prospective, multicenter study of the short-term clinical outcomes of a novel transcatheter aorticvalve system (Xcor system, Saint Medical Technology, Inc., Procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up clinical outcomes were evaluated after procedures.ResultsThe average age of the 130 patients was 71.24.4
Background The present study aimed to critically revise the published literature on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of Inspiris Resilia valve. Studies were excluded if they weren’t exclusively conducted on patients submitted to surgical aorticvalve replacement using the Inspiris Resilia bioprosthesis.
Small aortic annulus poses a major challenge in aorticvalve replacement due to the increased risk of prosthesispatient mismatch (PPM) and increased surgical risk. In recent years, transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a popular alternative to the traditional surgical aorticvalve replacement.
Valvular heart disease, including calcific or degenerative aortic stenosis (AS), is increasingly prevalent among the older adult population. Over the last few decades, treatment of severe AS has been revolutionised following the development of transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR).
(MedPage Today) -- LOS ANGELES -- Survival outcomes favored mechanical valves for isolated surgical aorticvalve replacement (SAVR) for people until age 60, after which a tissue valve may start to have an advantage, according to a large registry.
Getty Images milla1cf Mon, 01/29/2024 - 14:24 January 29, 2024 — Despite national guidelines recommending surgical aorticvalve replacement (SAVR) for patients under age 65 with severe aortic stenosis , many hospitals are still opting for a nonsurgical approach in patients under 60—possibly with poorer survival rates.
Shettys team followed 252 patients who underwent the Ross procedure, a heart valve replacement operation commonly used to treat younger patients with severe aorticvalve disease. Freedom from aortic regurgitation was 95.1%, 92.2%, 87.7%, and 84.5% Shettys team found that survival rates were 95.8% at 5 years, 94.3%
Objectives The clinical outcomes of transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant active cancer remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes of TAVR in patients diagnosed with AS and active cancer.
IntroductionSince TAVR was approved for lower-risk aortic stenosis (AS) patients, managing post-implantation conduction disturbances has become crucial, especially with self-expanding heart valves (SEV). Forty-seven received SEVs using COL, and 50 with CON techniques.
tim.hodson Mon, 03/31/2025 - 15:39 March 30, 2025 Medtronic has announced late-breaking data on five-year outcomes from the Evolut Low Risk Trial. The lower mortality risk and strong valve performance is meaningful for clinicians in evaluating treatment approaches that prioritize the overall well-being of patients." Reardon, M.D.,
This cohort study examines whether there is an association between osteosarcopenia and adverse outcomes, such as increased risk of mortality, in older adults following transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR).
Transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) is the standard treatment for severe aortic stenosis, but post-TAVR leaflet thrombus, identified by hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT), poses potential risks like cerebral thromboembolic events. had thrombus at any aorticvalve complex. Specifically, 14.2%
Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) induced by severe aortic stenosis (AS) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality. Aim This study aimed to systematically review and analyse the existing evidence on outcomes of emergency transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (eTAVI) and emergency balloon aortic valvuloplasty (eBAV) in CS patients.
This study aimed to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter closure using a double-disc occluder device in a single-center Vietnamese cohort.MethodA prospective descriptive study was conducted at Hanoi Heart Hospital, Vietnam. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0.ResultsThe
Bicuspid aorticvalve (BAV) is a common congenital heart condition that can lead to some valve-related complications, such as aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation, and is often associated with aortic root dilation.
2 Therefore, early identification of HF in high-risk populations, particularly post-MI, is essential for improving outcomes. Heart failure (HF) is one of the significant complications in patients with myocardial infarction (MI), leading to increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
The goal of the NOTION trial was to compare outcomes after transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aorticvalve replacement (SAVR) in unselected patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis.
The optimal management of concomitant chronic obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) recipients remains a debated topic. Major outcomes included procedural all-cause mortality and complications, major adverse cardiovascular events, and post-TAVR unplanned coronary revascularization.
Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction demonstrate improvement in left ventricular injection fraction (LVEF) after aorticvalve replacement (AVR). The timing and magnit.
BACKGROUND:A high permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) risk remains a concern of self-expandable transcatheter aorticvalve implantation, despite the continued improvements in implantation methodology. There were no group differences in 30-day all-cause mortality (1.4% versus 0%;P=0.608).CONCLUSIONS:Our
With the introduction of transcatheter aorticvalve implantation, the role of surgical aorticvalve replacement (SAVR) in elderly patients has been called into question. We investigated the short-term outcomes.
Transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) is a relatively new treatment method for aortic stenosis (AS) and has been demonstrated to be suitable for patients with varying risk levels.
This cohort study evaluates mortality and morbidity outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical replacement for failed bioprosthetic aorticvalves.
Surgical aorticvalve replacement (SAVR) is an established therapy for severe calcific aortic stenosis. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) protocols have been shown to improve outcomes for electiv.
Patient selection was based on the presence of isolated aorticvalve disease without the need for ascending aorta replacement or aortic root enlargement. The majority of patients (77.1%) presented with aortic stenosis, often accompanied by severe calcification. Peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established.
BackgroundThe widely used Bentall procedure is the criterion standard treatment for aortic root pathology. The primary outcome of interest was all‐cause mortality. Journal of the American Heart Association, Ahead of Print. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to compare the 2 prosthetic types.
Background Aortic stenosis is a life-limiting condition for which transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapy. Subsidiary outcomes included patient angina and breathlessness scores. After multivariate analysis, the presence of CAD had no effect on the primary outcome (HR 0.98, CI 0.68
Objectives Assessment of frailty prior to aorticvalve intervention is recommended in European and North American valvular heart disease guidelines. Methods Nine electronic databases were searched systematically for data on clinical outcomes post-TAVI/SAVR, where patients had undergone preoperative frailty assessment using the CFS.
(MedPage Today) -- CHICAGO -- Dapagliflozin (Farxiga) lowered mortality and heart failure worsening in high-risk older adults getting transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI), the DapaTAVI trial showed. In a population with a history of.
BACKGROUND:Data concerning the outcomes of transcatheter aorticvalve replacement in type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) are scarce. Self-expanding transcatheter heart valves were used in the majority of patients (n=1160; 91.4%). Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, Ahead of Print. Poverall=0.765; 1 year: 1.4%
ConclusionAortic valve replacement with the Perceval S valve through either an upper hemisternotomy or a right anterior thoracotomy is a procedure associated with low perioperative complication rates. This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. ResultsThe overall in-hospital mortality was 1,7%.
After bioprosthetic aorticvalve replacement, patients who took the oral drug warfarin had better outcomes including lower mortality rates and fewer blood clots, according to new research from Rochester, Minn.-based based Mayo Clinic.
New prosthetic valves and surgical approaches that shorten operation time and improve the outcome of patients with aorticvalve (AV) infective endocarditis (IE) and AV insufficiency (AVI) are crucial. The aim.
Tricuspid Valve Repair Existing literature on national surgical outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve repair or replacement is based on data from over a decade ago and may not reflect current practice results. Outcomes were worse with increasing surgical urgency, older age, dialysis dependence, and multiple reoperations.
BackgroundBicuspid aorticvalves are associated with ascending aortic pathology, but their impact on longterm outcomes, including aortic growth and adverse events, remains unclear.Methods and ResultsThis prospective cohortstudy included adult patients undergoing aorticvalve surgery or ascending aortic surgery at a single center (20072013).
What are the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aorticvalve replacement (SAVR) among patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and a small aortic annulus?
Background and aims Randomised controlled trials comparing transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aorticvalve replacement (SAVR) were performed in highly selected populations and data regarding long-term secondary complications beyond mortality are scarce.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content