This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
(MedPage Today) -- NEW YORK CITY -- Researchers eked out evidence of a small clinical benefit with the Sentinel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) device in transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) -- and pointed to the patients more likely.
Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 10 April 2025; doi:10.1038/s41569-025-01156-9 Findings from the BHF PROTECT-TAVI trial indicate that the routine use of cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aorticvalve implantation does not decrease the incidence of stroke within 72 h after the intervention.
Objectives The use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) during transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI) has been studied in several randomised trials. We aimed to perform a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised CEP trials, focusing on a clinically relevant reduction in disabling stroke.
(MedPage Today) -- CHICAGO -- Routine use of devices to prevent cerebral emboli during transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI) did not prevent strokes, a large randomized trial showed. Incidence of stroke within 72 hours after TAVI or.
BackgroundWe aimed to reevaluate randomized controlled trial data on outcomes of cerebral embolic protection device use during transcatheter aorticvalve implantation. Primary outcomes included all stroke, disabling stroke, and allcause mortality.
In a randomized trial, the routine use of cerebral embolic protection during TAVI did not reduce the incidence of stroke within 72 hours or before discharge from the hospital (if discharge occurred sooner).
BackgroundCerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) capture embolic material in an attempt to reduce ischemic brain injury during transcatheter aorticvalve replacement. Primary clinical outcome was all‐cause stroke. Secondary clinical outcomes were disabling stroke and all‐cause mortality.
The goal of the PROTECTED TAVR trial was to evaluate the efficacy of intraprocedural cerebral embolic protection (CEP) in reducing strokes among patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR for aortic stenosis.
Objective Postprocedural ischaemic and bleeding risks after transcatheter aorticvalve replacement (TAVR) remain a major concern. Ischaemic events were defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack or peripheral embolism at 1 year.
A fib is a well-established risk factor for ischemic strokes. In patients with nonvalvular A fib, the majority of embolicstrokes are caused by thrombi development in the left atrial appendage. Systemic anticoagulation (AC) is effective in reducing stroke risk in patients with A fib. 5,661 underwent percutaneous closure.
24 will focus on the following three current guideline updates: American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines 2023 Atrial Fibrillation Guideline - Pharmacology II: Strokes vs. Bleeds, What Do the Guidelines Tell Us About Practical Management in A-fib? The Guidelines Sessions at ACC.24
While intracardiac cardiac tumors and shunts are infrequent and typically asymptomatic, their existence can precipitate severe outcomes, including stroke, myocardial infarction and sudden death.Case Description:A 69-year-old female presented with left sided facial droop, slurred speech and left arm weakness.
Aims Perioperative stroke remains a devastating complication after transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI), and using a cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD) during TAVI may reduce the occurrence of stroke according to some studies. The risk of stroke was lower in the CEPD group: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49–0.96,
Aim To assess outcomes after cardiac surgery with biological valve replacement, valve repair or transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in accordance with oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment.
Background Current guidelines recommend transcatheter aorticvalve implantation (TAVI) for patients with aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta (PA). Our aim was to compare outcomes, including stroke and mortality, in well-matched patients with and without PA who received BEV during transfemoral TAVI procedures.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content