This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Coronary artery spasm (CAS), or Prinzmetal angina, is a recognised cause of myocardial ischaemia in non-obstructed coronary arteries which typically presents with anginal chest pain. This case report describes an atypical presentation of CAS in a 68-year-old white British male with cardiovascular riskfactors.
Ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is an increasingly recognized condition in patients presenting with angina and positive stress tests but without significant coronary artery stenosis. The paper discusses a potential interference between vasodilators used in trans-radial access and coronary spasm testing.
If it is angina, lowering the BP with IV Nitroglycerine may completely alleviate the pain and the (unseen) ECG ischemia. Or is it a very tight stenosis that does not allow enough flow to perfuse myocardium that has a high oxygen demand from severely elevated BP? The ST depressions in I and aVL have resolved.
Given the consistency of the clinical profile with typical angina, associated riskfactors, and abnormal ECG findings, a cardiology consult was promptly requested. Aortic Stenosis f. Left Main stenosis (not thrombosed) c. Aortic Stenosis [No Hx syncope, and no systolic murmur] f. This results in Type I MI.
link] A 62 year old man with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and carotid artery stenosis called 911 at 9:30 in the morning with complaint of chest pain. There is a trend toward these patients being younger — with a greater relative percentage of women — and fewer traditional cardiac riskfactors.
I quickly reviewed the patient’s records and saw that she was a 53 year old woman with a history of BMI 40, but no other identifiable riskfactors for coronary artery disease. The absence of riskfactors for coronary artery disease does not mean a patient is not at risk for OMI.
24: Joint American College of Cardiology/Journal of the American College of Cardiology Late-Breaking Clinical Trials (Session 402) Saturday, April 6 9:30 – 10:30 a.m.
Here are the images from the cardiac cath: Mid to distal-LAD in-stent stenosis with 100% occlusion and TIMI flow 0 LAD post-DES placement with TIMI 3 flow The amount of territory supplied by this vessel becomes obvious here (and goes on for a few more frames below this still).
Typical angina was defined as a symptom complex that includes substernal chest pressure or pain that was made worse with exertion/emotional stress, and relieved by rest or nitroglycerin. Atypical angina is classified as having any two of the three symptoms, and non-anginal pain any one of the three symptoms. years of age versus 59.0±8.4
We evaluated the primary outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) and other end points, by sex, in 1168 (22.6%) women and 4011 (77.4%) men. of invasive‐assigned men, and no ≥50% stenosis in 12.3% of invasive‐assigned men;P<0.001).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content