Remove Academic Remove Outcomes Remove TAVR
article thumbnail

New Late-breaking Data from Medtronic Evolut Low Risk Trial Demonstrate Strong Clinical and Cost-effectiveness Benefits of TAVR Platform

DAIC

milla1cf Tue, 03/12/2024 - 16:48 March 12, 2024 — Medtronic plc , a global leader in healthcare technology, today announced two late-breaking data presentations on four-year outcomes from the Evolut Low Risk Trial. The findings showed a strong economic benefit of Evolut TAVR for low-risk patients from a U.S.

TAVR 52
article thumbnail

Modified percutaneous coronary intervention-derived risk models (PARIS and CREDO-Kyoto integer scoring systems) applied to Japanese transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients

Open Heart

Objective Postprocedural ischaemic and bleeding risks after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain a major concern. We aimed to assess the accuracy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-derived models and the performance of a recalibrated model that included variables more applicable to TAVR.

article thumbnail

A NOTIONal truth : Surgical AVR deteriorates faster than TAVI, for some mysterious reasons!

Dr. S. Venkatesan MD

Reviewing NOTION study, the Nordic TAVI 10 year follow up has just been released (Ref 1) : Caution : Non-academic content This study reports the long-term outcome in low-risk individuals who required AVR. Now, some academic queries ? Was the outcome assessment blinded ? Was CAD accounted for outcome difference ?

article thumbnail

Highlights of ACC 2024

Cardiology Update

The percent change from baseline in fasting triglycerides (TG) at six months served as the primary outcome measure. The percent change from baseline in fasting TG at six months served as the primary outcome measure. A total of 716 patients underwent TAVR with either a self-expanding supraannular valve or a balloon-expandable valve.

Angina 52
article thumbnail

SPONSORED CONTENT: Unveiling the Future of Cardiovascular Workflow

DAIC

Providing exceptional cardiovascular care for patients to achieve the best possible outcomes is the number one goal for cardiologists, hands-down. The best possible outcome of this situation is inefficient workflow, driving higher overall cost of care and resulting in widespread physician and patient frustration. Why is that?