This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of catheter ablation compared with rate or rhythm control among patients with atrialfibrillation and heart failure.
Patients who undergo catheter ablation for atrialfibrillation (AFib) who also have heart failure with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) experienced a greater benefit from ablation in terms of clinical outcome, AFib recurrence and functional status, according to findings from the CABANA trial.
Clinical outcomes among patients with atrialfibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) are not well-known.
The efficacy of catheter ablation as a treatment approach for patients with concurrent atrialfibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) has been inadequately investigated.
Atrialfibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients with heart failure (HF). Catheter ablation of AF has been proven to be an effective therapeutic option for AF management in HF, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejectionfraction (HFrEF) [2, 3].
The HFA–PEFF score comprising echocardiographic and laboratory data is designed to diagnose heart failure with preservedejectionfraction and holds prognostic value in patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrialfibrillation (AF).
Studies have suggested that early atrialfibrillation (AF) ablation is associated with improved outcomes. However, it is unknown whether these patterns hold for persistent AF among patients with heart failure with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF).
The benefit of catheter ablation in patients with atrialfibrillation (AF) for patients with heart failure with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) remains uncertain.
Left atrial and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) elevation can reflect severity and dynamic status of heart failure (HF) in HF with preservedejectionfraction (pEF). Atrialfibrillation (AF) worsens HFpEF progression and pump failure, but catheter ablation can restore rhythm control in this population.
Late-breaking Clinical Trial Results from FARADISE, admIRE Study and Advent Trial at Heart Rhythm 2024 Highlight Pulsed Field Ablation Developments for AtrialFibrillation Treatment 8. Patent Covering the Use of Levosimendan in Pulmonary Hypertension with Heart Failure with PreservedEjectionFraction (PH-HFpEF) 10.
Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) and atrialfibrillation (AF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, it remains unclear whether SRM after a repeat CA for recurrent AF has the same effect as SRM after the initial CA in patients with AF and HFpEF.
A number of studies have examined the impact of atrialfibrillation (AF) ablation on outcomes in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection (HFrEF) patients. In contrast, data from HF with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) patients is limited to small outcome studies and less robust meta-analyses.
The impact of comorbidity burden on outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrialfibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure and preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) remains unclear.
Previous studies have demonstrated significant morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejectionfraction (HFrEF), particularly with accompanying atrialfibrillation (AF).
Catheter ablation has become the most effective rhythm control strategy in treating atrialfibrillation (AF), preventing AF recurrence and delaying its progression to persistent AF better than antiarrhythmic drugs.
Studies have shown an overriding benefit of AF ablation in patients with long-standing HFrEF and symptomatic AF. Therefore, this study assesses whether the sequence of HFpEF and AF diagnoses influence mortality and HF progression risk and the subsequent impact of AF ablation.
24 will focus on the following three current guideline updates: American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines 2023 AtrialFibrillation Guideline - Pharmacology II: Strokes vs. Bleeds, What Do the Guidelines Tell Us About Practical Management in A-fib? The Guidelines Sessions at ACC.24
Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation for atrialfibrillation (AF) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with HF with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF). However, the long-term outcomes and subclinical HF after nonparoxysmal AF ablation in HFpEF patients have not been fully evaluated.
Abstract Aims Atrialfibrillation (AF) is common in heart failure (HF) and negatively impacts outcomes. The role of ablation-based rhythm control in patients with AF and HF with preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced ejectionfraction (HFmrEF) is not known.
Background The Heart Failure Association Pretest assessment, echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, functional testing and final aetiology (HFA-PEFF) score has been developed for diagnosing heart failure with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF), which is frequently associated with atrialfibrillation (AF).
BackgroundHeart failure with preservedejectionfraction (HFpEF) and atrialfibrillation (AF) often coincide. Female sex is associated with both increased prevalence of HFpEF and reduced therapeutic efficacy of catheter ablation of AF. Forty-two were female. ml/m2 vs. 25.8 ml/m2, g/m2 vs. 83.0 g/m2,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content