This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cardiogenicshock (CS)is the most feared event following STEMI. We tend to perceive CS as an exclusive complication of STEMI. The incidence is half of that of STEMI, i.e., 2.5-5%. might show little elevation with considerable overlap of left main STEMI vs NSTEMI ) 2.Onset 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3558.
Here is the Queen of Hearts (version 1) interpretation: Click here to sign up for Queen of Hearts Access Angiogram images before and after intervention: Another view (before and after intervention): The patient was confirmed to be in cardiogenicshock, placed on ECMO, also with impella assist device. 15, 2022 post).
The VSR is what is causing the cardiogenicshock! It has been estimated that in the aggregate, they occur at a rate of about 3 per 1000 patients with acute MI, and most of these events occur in patients with STEMI. PIRP is strongly associated with myocardial rupture. PIRP was associated with persistent upright T waves.
The conventional machine algorithm interpreted this ECG as STEMI. Taking a step back , remember that sinus tachycardia is less commonly seen in OMI (except in cases of impending cardiogenicshock). See this post of RV MI with both McConnell sign and "D" sign: Inferior and Posterior STEMI. Both were wrong.
Subtle as a STEMI." (i.e., A temporary pacemaker was implanted, and she was admitted to the ICU with cardiogenicshock. In our study, there were 20/53 complete LAD OMI (TIMI-0 flow) which did not meet STEMI criteria. None of the 20 ever evolved to STEMI criteria. This one is easy for the Queen.
The ECG shows obvious STEMI(+) OMI due to probable proximal LAD occlusion. The patient in today’s case presented in cardiogenicshock from proximal LAD occlusion, in conjunction with a subtotally stenosed LMCA. The pain was 10/10 in intensity radiating bilaterally to the shoulders and also to the left arm and neck.
It may look identical t o the ST-T wave appearance seen after a STEMI with marked troponin elevation, that has now reperfused ( be this reperfusion spontaneous — or by treatment with PCI or thrombolytics ). A DDENDUM ( 10/26/2024 ) : I excerpted what follows below from My Comment in the August 12, 2022 post in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog ). =
The prehospital and ED computer interpretation was inferior STEMI: There’s normal sinus rhythm, first degree AV block and RBBB, normal axis and normal voltages. The paramedic notes called STEMI into question: “EMS disagree with monitor for STEMI callout. Vitals were normal except for oxygen saturation of 94%. Vitals were normal.
There is an obvious inferior posterior STEMI(+) OMI. Methods Retrospective study of consecutive inferior STEMI , comparing ECGs of patients with, to those without, RVMI, as determined by angiographic coronary occlusion proximal to the RV marginal branch. The April 17, 2022 post ( Leads V1,V2 misplacement ). How would one tell?
The ECG was read as "No STEMI" and the patient was treated like an average chest pain patient (despite the fact that a chest pain patient with active pain and active subendocardial ischemia is very high risk). The notes now refer to the patient being in cardiogenicshock, on pressors. Published 2022 Feb 20.
This has been termed a “STEMI equivalent” and included in STEMI guidelines, suggesting this patient should receive dual anti-platelets, heparin and immediate cath lab activation–or thrombolysis in centres where cath lab is not available. aVR ST segment elevation: acute STEMI or not? aVR ST Segment Elevation: Acute STEMI or Not?
Code STEMI was activated by the ED physician based on the diagnostic ECG for LAD OMI in ventricular paced rhythm. This was several months after the 2022 ACC Guidelines adding modified Sgarbossa criteria as a STEMI equivalent in ventricular paced rhythm). LAFB, atrial flutter, anterolateral STEMI(+) OMI. Limkakeng AT.
He was in cardiogenicshock requiring an impella for several days after cath. No further troponins were measured. He was taken to the cath lab where he was found to have acute total occlusion of his saphenous vein graft to his RCA, which was stented. Such is the situation in today's post by Drs.
See our other cases with similar patters, to burn this deep into your brain files: Smith : In my experience, these cases of LAD OMI with RBBB and LAFB are either about to arrest, post-arrest, and/or in cardiogenicshock. Acute chest pain, right bundle branch block, no STEMI criteria, and negative initial troponin.
Whenever there is tachycardia, I am skeptical of OMI unless it has led to severely compromised ejection fracction with cardiogenicshock. Supply-demand mismatch can cause ST Elevation (Type 2 STEMI). Also see these posts of Type II STEMI. Truly, the Marquette 12 SL algorithm correctly identifies this STEMI.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content