This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There is a regular narrow complex tachycardia. Thus, it is supraventricular tachycardia. It is important to remember that SVT includes Sinus Tachycardia! Sometimes even Wide Complex Tachycardia is Sinus. See this case in which Lewis leads were necessary to figure this out: Wide Complex Tachycardia.
She had a single chamber ICD/Pacemaker implanted several years prior due to ventricular tachycardia. The ECG was interpreted as showing atrialflutter with 2:1 conduction. Answer : The ECG above shows a regular wide complex tachycardia. The heart rate could be compatible with that of a 2:1 conducted atrialflutter.
This strip was obtained: Apparent Wide Complex Tachycardia at a rate of 280 What do you think? To me, it was clearly atrialflutter with 1:1 conduction. The rate of 280 is just right for atrialflutter. The waves look like atrialflutter waves, NOT like a wide ventricular complex.
There are 2 atrial "bumps" for every QRS. Here I put arrows: Arrows shows slow atrialflutter waves. I favor the P s, Q s, 3 R Approach — as a simple acronym to facilitate recall of the 5 KEY Parameters for rhythm interpretation ( See My Comment in the October 25, 2022 post in Dr. Smith’s ECG Blog ). Look at V1.
Abstract Introduction The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrialflutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART.
We see a regular tachycardia with a narrow QRS complex and no evidence of OMI or subendocardial ischemia. The differential of a regular narrow QRS tachycardia is sinus tachycardia, SVT, and atrialflutter with regular conduction. There are no P waves preceding the QRS complexes, and no clear flutter waves.
During observation in the ED the patient had multiple self-terminating runs of Non-Sustained monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT). This patient very likely has some form of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Of the ventricular outflow tract tachycardias (RVOT-VT) makes up 80-90%.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content