Remove 2019 Remove STEMI Remove Stent
article thumbnail

5 Cardiologists said this is not a STEMI. But was it an OMI?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Over the next few hours, four other general cardiologists "signed off on the initial ECG without recognizing STEMI." They found 100% acute mid-LAD Occlusion MI, stented with excellent angiographic result. Learning Points: STEMI criteria misses 25-40% of OMI, like this case for example. mm of the "required" 1.0

STEMI 52
article thumbnail

Postprocedural Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Circulation

The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate superiority of PPA to reduce the primary efficacy end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), or urgent revascularization (any vessel) within 30 days. to 1.57]).

article thumbnail

Cath Lab occupied. Which patient should go now (or does only one need it? Or neither?)

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

A prehospital “STEMI” activation was called on a 75 year old male ( Patient 1 ) with a history of hyperlipidemia and LAD and Cx OMI with stent placement. The two cases were considered: Patient 1 was recognized by the ED provider and the cardiologist as having resolved “STEMI”. It was stented. This was a large OMI.

article thumbnail

Something Winter This Way Comes

EMS 12-Lead

One stent was deployed with restorative TIMI-0 flow. link] deWinter first reported his unique characteristics of LAD occlusion in 2008, and since the respective ECG changes do not fit the conventional STEMI paradigm (as he even stated – “instead of signature ST-segment elevation” ….) it has been subsequently deemed a STEMI-equivalent.

STEMI 52
article thumbnail

7 steps to missing posterior Occlusion MI, and how to avoid them

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Step 1 to missing posterior MI is relying on the STEMI criteria. A prospective validation of STEMI criteria based on the first ED ECG found it was only 21% sensitive for Occlusion MI, and disproportionately missed inferoposterior OMI.[1] But it is still STEMI negative. A 15 lead ECG was done (below). In a study last year, 14.4%

STEMI 52
article thumbnail

Chest (or abdominal?) pain and ECG artifact.

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

It is diagnostic of OMI, but this is SUBACUTE OMI I sent this ECG to my "EKG Nerdz" friends, without any clinical info at all and they answered "OMI" The Queen said: "STEMI-Equivalent with High Confidence:" Notice she sees findings in both normal beats and PVCs. It was opened and stented. The August 26, 2019 post — baseline artifact.

Blog 57
article thumbnail

A man in his early 40s with chest pain a "normal ECG" by computer algorithm. Should we avoid interrupting a physician to interpret his ECG?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Notice on the right side of the image how the algorithm correctly measures STE sufficient in V1 and V2 to meet STEMI criteria in a man older than age 40. As most would agree, this ECG shows highly specific findings of anterolateral OMI, even with STEMI criteria in this case. Thus, this is obvious STEMI(+) OMI until proven otherwise.