Remove 2019 Remove Outcomes Remove STEMI
article thumbnail

60 year old with chest pain, STEMI negative. What should the discharge diagnosis be?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

So while there’s no diagnostic STEMI criteria, there are multiple ischemic abnormalities in 11/12 leads involving QRS, ST and T waves, which are diagnostic of a proximal LAD occlusion. First trop was 7,000ng/L (normal 25% of ‘Non-STEMI’ patients with delayed angiography have the exact same pathology of acute coronary occlusion.

article thumbnail

The impact of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalized patients with STEMI in the United States: insights from the National Inpatient Sample

Coronary Artery Disease Journal

Background It is unclear how COVID-19 pandemic affected care and outcomes among patients who are diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the USA. Results There were 1 050 905 hospitalizations with STEMI, and there was an 8.2% Results There were 1 050 905 hospitalizations with STEMI, and there was an 8.2%

article thumbnail

Early versus delayed complete revascularisation in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open Heart

Background Several studies have demonstrated that complete revascularisation improves clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion revascularisation remains controversial.

article thumbnail

Anterior OMI. What does the angiogram show?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

This was a machine read STEMI positive OMI. the investigators reviewed outcomes in 118 patients presenting with NSTEMI. The meaning of this quote is that at times, something as obvious as the dramatic anterior lead ST elevation that we see in today's tracing is not the result of an acute LAD STEMI. His ECG is shown below.

STEMI 113
article thumbnail

A man in his 50s with acute chest pain who is lucky to still be alive.

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

You can subscribe for news and early access (via participating in our studies) to the Queen of Hearts here: [link] queen-form This EMS ECG was transmitted to the nearby Emergency Department where it was remotely reviewed by a physician, who interpreted it as normal, or at least without any features of ischemia or STEMI.

article thumbnail

Four patients with chest pain and ‘normal’ ECG: can you trust the computer interpretation?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

1-3] But these studies were very short duration and used cardiology interpretation of ECGs or emergent angiography rather than patient outcomes. 4,5] We have now formally studied this question: Emergency department Code STEMI patients with initial electrocardiogram labeled ‘normal’ by computer interpretation: a 7-year retrospective review.[6]

article thumbnail

Guidelines would (erroneously) say that this patient who was defibrillated and resuscitated does not need emergent angiography

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

A reliable study would keep track of all patients with shockable arrest and analyze the ones who were not enrolled to see their outcomes. COACT: The COACT trial was fatally flawed, and because of it, many cardiologists are convinced that if there are no STEMI criteria, the patient does not need to go to the cath lab.