Remove 2019 Remove Myocardial Infarction Remove STEMI
article thumbnail

The impact of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalized patients with STEMI in the United States: insights from the National Inpatient Sample

Coronary Artery Disease Journal

Background It is unclear how COVID-19 pandemic affected care and outcomes among patients who are diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the USA. Results There were 1 050 905 hospitalizations with STEMI, and there was an 8.2% for patients admitted in 2016–2019 period. vs. 10.7%; P < 0.001).

article thumbnail

Postprocedural Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Circulation

Patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned by center to receive low-dose PPA or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. mg·kg·h of bivalirudin intravenously). mg·kg·h of bivalirudin intravenously). to 1.57]).

article thumbnail

75 year old with 24 hours of chest pain, STEMI negative

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

STEMI negative : the EMS automated interpretation read, “STEMI negative. Inferior infarct, age undetermined. According to the STEMI paradigm, the patient doesn’t have an acute coronary occlusion and doesn't need emergent reperfusion, so the paramedics can bring them to the ED for assessment, without involving cardiologists.

article thumbnail

Early versus delayed complete revascularisation in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open Heart

Background Several studies have demonstrated that complete revascularisation improves clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion revascularisation remains controversial.

article thumbnail

OMI-NOMI paradigm established as better than STEMI-NSTEMI with new article

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Their OMI Manifesto details how use of standard STEMI criteria results in an unacceptable level of inaccuracy, in which an estimated 25-30% of acute coronary occlusions are missed! The article by Aslanger, Smith et al that is featured above in today’s post has just been published.

STEMI 52
article thumbnail

The pseudo-superiority of pPCI is exposed one more time … but it will thrive!

Dr. S. Venkatesan MD

“ Since Intravenous lysis looks too simplistic, that do not need expertise, and lacks a commercial trail, it is wrongly depicted as inferior management strategy in STEMI “ Every one of us is equally responsible for this sorry state of affairs. In LAD STEMI time is more crucial. Circulation 2006;114:2019-25

article thumbnail

7 steps to missing posterior Occlusion MI, and how to avoid them

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Step 1 to missing posterior MI is relying on the STEMI criteria. A prospective validation of STEMI criteria based on the first ED ECG found it was only 21% sensitive for Occlusion MI, and disproportionately missed inferoposterior OMI.[1] But it is still STEMI negative. A 15 lead ECG was done (below). In a study last year, 14.4%

STEMI 52