Remove 2019 Remove Cardiogenic Shock Remove Outcomes
article thumbnail

Cardiovascular outcomes in long COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Systematic search conducted without language restrictions from December 1, 2019 to June 31, 2022 on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane library, ProQuest Coronavirus Research Database, COVID-19 Living Overview of the Evidence (L-OVE) subset of Episteminokos and the World Health Organization (WHO) Covid-19 databases.

article thumbnail

How cardiogenic shock in NSTEMI is different from STEMI?

Dr. S. Venkatesan MD

Cardiogenic shock (CS)is the most feared event following STEMI. Outcome There are differing data about prognosis of CS in STEMI vs NSTEMI. Ironically, in many patients of CS in NSTEMI, the outcome can be worse than STEMI, as there is no single culprit and myocardial salvage does not appear to be a primary issue.

article thumbnail

Abstract 4146823: Trends and Outcomes in Heart Failure Admissions and Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Circulation

Cardiogenic shock rates were highest among SV-CHD patients, with significant fluctuations, followed by DV-CHD patients. Heart transplant rates were low but increased slightly in 2020 for patients without CHD, with DV and SV CHD patients showing fluctuating rates peaking in 2018 and 2019, then declining in 2020.

article thumbnail

Timing of Initiation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support and Outcomes Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

Journal of the American Heart Association

BackgroundVenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides full hemodynamic support for patients with cardiogenic shock, but optimal timing of ECMO initiation remains uncertain. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between time from admission to ECMO initiation and in‐hospital death.

article thumbnail

Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry in Japan

Journal of the American Heart Association

The quarterly prevalence and outcomes were reported. in the first quarter of 2019 to 58.3% After adjusting for the confounders, the risk difference in the fourth quarter of 2021 relative to the first quarter of 2019 for in‐hospital mortality was not significant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69–1.01]).ConclusionsOur

article thumbnail

Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions

Circulation: Heart Failure

Patient characteristics, outcomes, and procedural volume were compared among 3 cohorts: admissions to non-ATCs, admissions to ATCs, and transfers to ATCs. A secondary analysis evaluated outcomes for severe HF hospitalizations (cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and mechanical ventilation).

article thumbnail

Extreme shock and cardiac arrest in COVID patient

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Assessment was severe sudden cardiogenic shock. However, in multiple studies, even in the absence of AMI, both acute and chronic myocardial injury (as diagnosed by any elevated cTn) are powerful markers of adverse outcomes in both the short and long term. They recorded an EC G: New ST Elevation. What is it? 3–8 Shi et al.