This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Case continued A bedside ultrasound showed diminished LV EF and of course bradycardia. RVMI explains part of the shock. For review — GO TO: The June 4, 2018 post ( LA-LL reversal ). The July 29, 2018 post ( LA-RA reversal ). The November 4, 2018 post ( Leads V1,V2 misplacement ).
I have always said that tachycardia should argue against acute MI unless there is cardiogenicshock or 2 simultaneous pathologies. My Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD ( 6/17/2018 ): = Excellent case with insightful learning points explaining why these serial tracings are not indicative of acute inferior infarction.
Many of these issues were described in a prior post by Dr. Angie Lobo ( @aloboMD ) (For open-access reviews of this literature, see Saw 2016 , Saw 2017 , or Hayes 2018.) Often, intravascular ultrasound or intravascular optical coherence tomography is requeried to make the diagnosis. Lobo et al. The SCAD cases in Lobo et al.
Can J of Cardiol 2018, 34: 132-145 Here are some other cases: LVH, LBBB, RBBB, and RVH may manifest ST depression without any ischemia! An elderly man with sudden cardiogenicshock, diffuse ST depressions, and STE in aVR Literature 1. A emergent cardiology consult can be helpful for equivocal cases. Left main? 3-vessel disease?
A b rief chart review revealed his most recent echo in 2018, with LV EF 67%, “very small” inferior wall motion abnormality. Shocked x 2 without effect. Pads were placed with ultrasound guidance, so they were in the correct position. Past medical history includes coronary stenting 17 years prior. However, this is not SVT.
Tachycardia is unusual for OMI, unless the patient is in cardiogenicshock (or getting close). A bedside ultrasound should be done to assess volume and other etiologies of tachycardia, but if no cause of type 2 MI is found, the cath lab should be activated NOW. The January 30, 2018 post — for PTA.
On arrival in the ED, a bedside ultrasound showed poor LV function (as predicted by the Queen of Hearts) with diffuse B-lines. This is a helpful PEARL to be aware of since on occasion, acute ST-T wave changes of acute MI may only be seen in PVCs, and not in the rest of the tracing ( See My Comment in the October 8, 2018 post).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content