This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The ECG in Figure-1 — was obtained from a middle-aged woman with positional tachycardia and diaphoresis with change of position from suprine to sitting. My THOUGHTS on the ECG in Figure-1: The rhythm is sinus tachycardia at ~105/minute ( ie, The R-R interval is regular — and just under 3 large boxes in duration ).
I see the following: There is sinus tachycardia ( upright P wave with fixed PR interval in lead II ) — at the rapid rate of ~130/minute. Sinus Tachycardia and RAD — as already noted above. PEARL # 2: In the absence of associated heart failure ( cardiogenic shock ) — sinus tachycardia is not a common finding in acute MI.
It shows sinus tachycardia with right bundle branch block. Taking a step back , remember that sinus tachycardia is less commonly seen in OMI (except in cases of impending cardiogenic shock). As per Dr. Frick — sinus tachycardia is usually not seen with acute OMI unless the patient is in cardiogenic shock. Both were wrong.
Because of this, it is uncommon to see sinus tachycardia with a prolonged PR interval. And I wish I had record of ECG monitoring just before — and during — and just after the rhythm changes from the regular tachycardia in ECG #1 — to the bigeminal rhythm in ECG #2. This is precisely what we see in Figure-6.
Sent by Dan Singer MD, written by Meyers, edits by Smith A man in his late 30s presented with acute chest pain and normal vitals except tachycardia at about 115 bpm. As Ken says below, tachycardia is not common in OMI and distorts the ST segment, so managing the tachycardia and repeating the ECG is a good strategy.
There is sinus tachycardia at ~100/minute. As often emphasized by Dr. Smith — sinus tachycardia is not a common finding with acute OMI unless something else is going on (ie, cardiogenic shock ). In today's case — the sinus tachycardia may have been a harbinger of this patient's ultimate demise.
SCAD is strongly associated with fibromuscular dysplasia (72% of patients in one series), and can impact other vascular beds, most commonly the renal arteries, cerebrovasculature, and iliac arteries. Buller, C. Starovoytov, A., Robinson, S., Vuurmans, T., Humphries, K., & & Mancini, G. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
The patient had no hypertension, no tachycardia, a normal hemoglobin, no drug use, no hypotension/shock, no murmur of aortic stenosis. This is from the 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines. Acute myocardial injury: Is it myocardial infarction, or perhaps myocarditis? If it is MI, is it type 1 or type 2? Is it STEMI or NonSTEMI?
Details of my approach to ECG diagnosis of BBB are beyond the scope of this blog post — but are discussed in the ECG Video below ( or in free download of Section 5 PDF on BBB — from my ECG-2014-ePub ). The rhythm is sinus tachycardia at ~105/minute. The rhythm is sinus tachycardia at ~115/minute.
Methods STEMI activations between January 2014 and April 2018 at the University of Arizona Medical Center were identified. Systematic Assessment of the ECG in Figure-1: My Descriptive Analysis of ECG findings in Figure-1 is as follows: Sinus tachycardia at ~110/minute. A normal PR interval. No chamber enlargement.
10 The 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease , referencing this article, gives this recommendation: "CLASS IIb 1. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63(22):e57-e185; June 10, 2014.
Here is data from a study we published in 2014 for type II NonSTEMI: Sandoval Y. In such cases, it is common for tachycardia to exaggerate the ST Elevation And, in fact, there was no new acute MI at this visit - troponins did not rise again. First was 2.9 ng/mL and subsequentle dropped to 1.5 Murakami M.
Chagas disease (ChD) was associated with increased rates of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in ICD patients only in the initial two periods, but there was no statistical difference in the last period. Progressive decline across periods in mortality rates among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
2** Furthermore, the primary effectiveness endpoint (PEE) of acute pulmonary vein isolation and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AF, Atrial Tachycardia, or Atrial Flutter) was 75.6%. viii] Zoni-Berisso M, Lercari F, Carazza T, Domenicucci S (2014) Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: European perspective.
of very high risk NSTEMI patients underwent angiography in less than 2 hours in accordance with the 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines. Did YOU Notice that the underlying rhythm in Figure-1 appears to be atrial tachycardia? In fact, in the one study I'm aware of in which it has been studied, only 6.4% Lupu et al. Clinical Cardiology.
Or, there could be mid-ventricular Takotsubo , in which there is poor function ( and ballooning ) of the mid-LV, with good function at both the base and the apex ( See the June 24, 2014 post — and My Comment in the July 21, 2022 post of Dr. Smith's ECG Blog regarding Takotsubo variant patterns ).
It is not always appreciated that chest pain is one of the most common associated symptoms of hypertensive crisis presenting to the ED ( occurring in more than half of the patients with HT urgency and in an even greater percentage of those with HT emergency in the study by Salkic et al Mater Sociomed 26(1):12-16, 2014 ).
While its action improves AV conduction it may increase the sinus rate, producing a sinus tachycardia with adverse effect. Section 2F ( 6 pages = the " short " Answer ) from my ECG-2014 Pocket Brain book provides quick written review of the AV Blocks ( This is a free download ). However, Atropine is not benign.
Or, there could be mid-ventricular Takotsubo , in which there is poor function ( and ballooning ) o f the mid-LV, with good function at both the base and the apex and, still other anatomic possibilities ( See the June 24, 2014 post and My Comment in the July 21, 2022 post of Dr. Smith's ECG Blog regarding Takotsubo variant patterns ).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content