Remove 2014 Remove Ischemia Remove STEMI
article thumbnail

Is OMI an ECG Diagnosis?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

I sent this to the Queen of Hearts So the ECG is both STEMI negative and has no subtle diagnostic signs of occlusion. Non-STEMI guidelines call for “urgent/immediate invasive strategy is indicated in patients with NSTE-ACS who have refractory angina or hemodynamic or electrical instability,” regardless of ECG findings.[1]

STEMI 121
article thumbnail

Is this Acute Ischemia? More on LVH.

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

There may be ischemia present, but it is not evident on the ECG. LVH and the diagnosis of STEMI - how should we apply the current guidelines? LVH and the diagnosis of STEMI - how should we apply the current guidelines? Journal of Electrocardiology 47 (2014) 655–660. All troponins were negative. Birnbaum Y and Mahboob A.

article thumbnail

90 year old with acute chest and epigastric pain, and diffuse ST depression with reciprocal STE in aVR: activate the cath lab?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

This has been termed a “STEMI equivalent” and included in STEMI guidelines, suggesting this patient should receive dual anti-platelets, heparin and immediate cath lab activation–or thrombolysis in centres where cath lab is not available. His response: “subendocardial ischemia. Anything more on history? POCUS will be helpful.”

article thumbnail

7 steps to missing posterior Occlusion MI, and how to avoid them

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

Step 1 to missing posterior MI is relying on the STEMI criteria. A prospective validation of STEMI criteria based on the first ED ECG found it was only 21% sensitive for Occlusion MI, and disproportionately missed inferoposterior OMI.[1] But it is still STEMI negative. A 15 lead ECG was done (below). In a study last year, 14.4%

STEMI 52
article thumbnail

Is this a STEMI? No, not by definition! Why not? Why is this Important?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

This is all but diagnostic of STEMI, probably due to wraparound LAD The cath lab was activated. This was clearly severe subepicardial ischemia causing ST Elevation, but it was not of a long enough duration to result in measurable infarct. Here is his triage ECG: There is massive STE in V3-V6, and also STE in II, III, aVF. Thelin et al.

STEMI 52
article thumbnail

ECG Blog #367 — Recognize The KEY Finding?

Ken Grauer, MD

This blog post reviews the basics for predicting the " C ulprit" A rtery — as well as the importance of the term, " O MI" ( = O cclusion-based MI ) as an improvement from the outdated STEMI paradigm. ECG Blog #271 — Reviews determination of the ST segment baseline ( with discussion of the entity of diffuse Subendocardial Ischemia).

Blog 78
article thumbnail

What does this ECG show?

Dr. Smith's ECG Blog

QOH versions 1 and 2 both say Not OMI, with high confidence, without any clinical context, despite the abnormal STE meeting STEMI criteria. That said — I did not interpret these differences as the result of acute ischemia. Of note, there is arguably terminal QRS distortion in V4-V6. Pericarditis maybe."