This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I sent this to the Queen of Hearts So the ECG is both STEMI negative and has no subtle diagnostic signs of occlusion. Non-STEMI guidelines call for “urgent/immediate invasive strategy is indicated in patients with NSTE-ACS who have refractory angina or hemodynamic or electrical instability,” regardless of ECG findings.[1]
Recall from this post referencing this study that "reciprocal STD in aVL is highly sensitive for inferior OMI (far better than STEMI criteria) and excludes pericarditis, but is not specific for OMI." 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Circulation , 130 (25).
LVH and the diagnosis of STEMI - how should we apply the current guidelines? Journal of Electrocardiology 47 (2014) 655–660. This one mimics inferior STEMI (Figure 4): Concentric LVH, NO wall motion abnormality Case 5. How about diagnosing anterior STEMI in the setting of LVH? All troponins were negative.
Step 1 to missing posterior MI is relying on the STEMI criteria. A prospective validation of STEMI criteria based on the first ED ECG found it was only 21% sensitive for Occlusion MI, and disproportionately missed inferoposterior OMI.[1] But it is still STEMI negative. A 15 lead ECG was done (below). In a study last year, 14.4%
Another overlooked OMI ( Cardiologist limited by STEMI Definition — OMI evident by Mirror Test ) — See My Comment at the bottom of the page in the September 21, 2020 post on Dr. Smith’s ECG Blog. Smith’s ECG Blog. ECG Media Pearl # 9 ( 5:40 minutes Video ) — ECG Blog #192 — Reviews the 3 Causes of AV Dissociation ( 2/9/2021 ).
The "criteria" for posterior STEMI are 0.5 Is it STEMI or NonSTEMI? It was opened and stented with a door to balloon time of about 120 minutes (this is long for STEMI, but very short for a high risk Non STEMI). The 4th, after the opening of the artery and release of troponin from the cardiac circulation, was 99.9
This blog post reviews the basics for predicting the " C ulprit" A rtery — as well as the importance of the term, " O MI" ( = O cclusion-based MI ) as an improvement from the outdated STEMI paradigm. ECG Blog #294 — How to tell IF the "culprit" artery has reperfused. ECG Blog #194 — AIVR as a sign that the "culprit" artery has reperfused.
ECG Blog #193 — Reviews the concept of why the term “OMI” ( = O cclusion-based MI ) should replace the more familiar term STEMI — and — reviews the basics on how to predict the " culprit " artery. Section 2F ( 6 pages = the " short " Answer ) from my ECG-2014 Pocket Brain book provides quick written review of the AV Blocks.
A prior ECG from 1 month ago was available: The presentation ECG was interpreted as STEMI and the patient was transferred emergently to the nearest PCI center. Circulation, 117, 1890–1893. [3]: So maybe she is better than I am. Smith comment: the ECG in question could be due to Brugada, even though there is a change from baseline.
Clinical Course The paramedic activated a “Code STEMI” alert and transported the patient nearly 50 miles to the closest tertiary medical center. 2 The astute paramedic recognized this possibility and announced a CODE STEMI. Circulation. Circulation 67, No. Circulation 1970;41:623-627 9. What do you see?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content