This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
She has not yet been seen by electrophysiology or had further genetic testing for Brugada syndrome. Induced Brugada-type electrocardiogram, a sign for imminent malignant arrhythmias. As for our patient, on discharge, her EKG had completed returned to her baseline morphology and she has been doing well in follow-up.
She has not yet been seen by electrophysiology or had further genetic testing for Brugada syndrome. Induced Brugada-type electrocardiogram, a sign for imminent malignant arrhythmias. As for our patient, on discharge, her EKG had completed returned to her baseline morphology and she has been doing well in follow-up.
J Electrocardiology 45 (2012):433-442. A score including ECG pattern, early familial SCD antecedents, inducible electrophysiological study, presentation as syncope or as aborted SCD and SND had a predictive performance of 0.82. Bayes de Luna, A et al. and proband status (HR 2.1).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join thousands of users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content